There is No Israeli "Occupation"
There is No Israeli "Occupation"
Arab spokesmen regularly complain about what they call deceptively "the
Israeli occupation" of the Judea-Samaria-Gaza territories. But the truth
is that there is no such "Israeli occupation"; according to
International Agreements and Treaties of post WWI.
To begin with, nearly all Arab-Palestinians currently live under Yasir Arafat's
rule or Mahmmoud Abbas, not Israel's.
Following the signing of the Oslo
accords, the Israelis withdrew temporarily from nearly half of the territories,
including the cities where 98.5% of Arab-Palestinians reside. The notion that
the Arab-Palestinians are living under "Israeli occupation" is simply
false. The areas from which Israel
has not withdrawn temporarily are virtually uninhabited, except for the 2%
where Israelis reside.
The term "occupation" is also falsely used to indicate that Israel
has no right to any presence in Judea-Samaria-Gaza or the Old
City section of Jerusalem,
and that the Israeli presence in any of those areas falsely constitutes illegal
"occupation" of someone else's land. In fact, Israel
has the strongest religious, historical, and legal claim to this land; The
territories of Judea-Samaria-Gaza and the Old
City of Jerusalem
were integral parts of the Jewish kingdoms throughout the biblical eras, and
are explicitly mandated by the Hebrew Bible as part of the Land
of Israel and by International
Agreements and Treaties of post WWI.
These lands were Jewish thousands years ago, under King David, King Solomon,
and other Jewish rulers; can anybody name a Arab-Palestinian king who ever
ruled over "Palestine" - Israel?
No--because there never were any.
All of the most important Jewish religious sites are situated in those Judea
and Samaria territories. The very
name "Judea" --a term which was commonly used by the international
community throughout all the centuries until the Jordanian occupation in 1949--
is derived from the same root as the word "Jew," testifying to the
deep Jewish connection to the land. The reason Jews are called "Jews"
is because we come from Judea. This historical-religious
right was the basis for the League of Nations decision,
in 1922, to endorse the Jewish people's right to all of the Holy
Land – Land of Israel,
their historical ancestral land on both sides of the Jordan River.
From the standpoint of international law (also See the April 1920 San
Remo Resolution confirmed by the Treaty of Sevres
Article 95), it is important to note that prior to 1967, there was no other
recognized sovereign power in the territories. Israel's
capture and liberation of Judea-Samaria-Gaza and the Old
City of Jerusalem
in 1967 did not constitute an illegal "occupation" of someone else's
land, because prior to 1967, there was no legal or recognized sovereign power
there. The Jordanian occupation of Judea-Samaria and Jerusalem
during 1949-1967 was illegal, having been carried out in defiance of the United
Nations Security Council. The only countries in the world to recognize it were Pakistan
and (in part) England
which during the Mandate supported the Arab population and trained and armed
the Jordanian Army.
Furthermore, Israel
captured and liberated the territories in self-defense. Israel
took over Judea-Samaria-Gaza and the Old City of Jerusalem in self-defense, in
response to aggression by Jordan
and Egypt in
June 1967. Had Jordan
not invaded Israel
--ignoring pleas by Israel
to stay out of the war-- Israel
would not control and posses Judea and Samaria
today. As former State Department Legal Adviser and former head of the
International Court of Justice in The Hague,
Stephen Schwebel, has written: "Where the prior holder of territory had
seized that territory unlawfully, the state which subsequently takes that
territory in the lawful exercise of self-defense has, against that prior
holder, better title."
It is also significant that U.N. Security Council Resolution 242 (I must state
U.N. resolutions cannot supersede International Agreements and Treaties which
granted all the territory west of the Jordan River to
the Jewish people and it also included the territory east of the Jordan
River) does not require complete Israeli withdrawal from the
territories. U.N. Resolution 242 (cannot supersede previous International Agreements
and Treaties – such as 1920 San Remo) requires Israel to withdraw "from
territories" captured in 1967, but the authors of the resolution
deliberately left out the word 'the' before 'territories' because it was their
conviction --as articulated by then-British foreign secretary George Brown--
"that Israel will not withdraw from all the territories." The Soviets
tried to insert 'the', but that effort was specifically rejected so as not to
suggest that Israel
is obliged to surrender all of the territories.
Finally, it should also be noted that the Oslo
Accords from 1995 (were for 5 years; which have terminated in 2000) recognize Israel's
right to remain in the territories, at least until a final settlement is
reached. The Oslo accords accepts Israel's
presence in the territories at least until an Israel-Arab PA agreement on the
final status of those areas. Chapter 2, Article X, Clause 4, specifically
recognize that in the disputed territories, "Israel shall continue to
carry the responsibility for external security, as well as the responsibility
for overall security of Israelis for the purpose of safeguarding their internal
security and public order" until a final accord is reached. Furthermore,
the Oslo accords (which have terminated) do not require Israel to dismantle any
of the Israeli communities in Judea-Samaria-Gaza--in effect, an acknowledgment
of Israel's right to maintain those communities, at least until a final-status
agreement is reached. The Oslo
Accords were for 5 years only and expired in 2000.
In short, the notion that there is an illegal Israeli "occupation" is
a myth.
No comments:
Post a Comment