All the territory
west of the Jordan
River and more belongs
to the State of Israel
It also needs to build 3 secure superhighway
connecting Judea and Samaria Israel
Construct extensive military bases inJudea and Samaria Judea and Samaria
Israel Jerusalem
Construct extensive military bases in
Open Atarot
airport and a high tech center and more industry, and build many additional
roads and secure highways in and from Jerusalem
Israel must also build a minimum of 15,000 housing units in the Galil and 15,000 housing units in the Negev every year for the next ten years and expand the infrastructure, public transportation – fast trains, roads and highways. They have to expand industry and commerce with incentives to enhance the desire of people to live in the Galil and theNegev .
Construct military bases and local agencies inJudea and Samaria
YJ Draiman
Israel must also build a minimum of 15,000 housing units in the Galil and 15,000 housing units in the Negev every year for the next ten years and expand the infrastructure, public transportation – fast trains, roads and highways. They have to expand industry and commerce with incentives to enhance the desire of people to live in the Galil and the
Construct military bases and local agencies in
YJ Draiman
P.S. The Arabs were
allocated after WWI over 13 million sq. km. of territory with a wealth of oil
reserves. There is already an Arab Palestinian state allocated to them in
violation of International Agreements, which is on Jewish land over three times
the size of Israel, east of the Jordan River; it is called Jordan where 80% of
the population are Arab Palestinians and the Arabs in Judea and Samaria have a
Jordanian passport.
YJ Draiman
A second Arab-Palestinian State west of the Jordan River is a fantasy that will never happen.
ReplyDeleteIt is Jewish territory for eternity. As referenced below, there is no justification whatsoever for another Arab-Palestinian State west of the Jordan River.
The Arabs have Jordan which is Jewish territory, the also have the homes and the over 120,000 sq. km. of the territory they confiscated from the over a million Jewish families they expelled who now reside in Israel and they also have over 13 million sq. km. the Arabs were allocated with a wealth of oil reserves, when the Ottoman Empire dissolved by the Allied forces in WWI.
If you read the 1917 Balfour Declaration (Which emulated Napoleons 1799 letter to the Jewish community in Palestine promising that The National Home for The Jewish people will be reestablished in Palestine, as the Jews are the rightful owners). Nowhere does it state an Arab entity west of The Jordan River.
The San Remo Conference of 1920 does not state an Arab entity west of The Jordan River. The Mandate for Palestine terms does not state an Arab entity west of the Jordan River. It specifically states a Jewish National Home in Palestine without limiting the Jewish territory in Palestine. It also states that the British should work with the Jewish Agency as the official representative of the Jews in Palestine to implement the National Home of the Jewish people in Palestine. I stress again; nowhere does it state that an Arab entity should be implemented west of the Jordan River.
As a matter of historical record, The British reallocated over 77% of Jewish Palestine to the Arab-Palestinians in 1922 with specific borders and Jordan took over additional territory like the Gulf of Aqaba which was not part of the allocation to Jordan.
No where in any of the above stated agreements or any resolutions that provides for an Arab entity west of the Jordan River. It specifically states political right to the Jewish people. The U.N. resolutions are non-binding with no legal standing. The Oslo Accords is null and void.
YJ Draiman
The U.N. cannot create states, it can only recommend a non-binding with no legal standing, and so can other nations only recommend and not create a state that never existed before in history. If they want an Arab-Palestinian state, it already exists; it is Jordan which has taken about 80% of Jewish allocated land.
ReplyDeleteIn 1947, the UN Gen. Assembly passed Resolution 181 recommending the partition of Palestine, a non-binding with no legal standing (which was not accepted by the Arabs makes it null and void). This did not create the State of Israel. The General Assembly does not create countries, make laws, or alter the Mandates (Mandates were a big brother system for setting up independent countries to be led by its native indigenous populations, with historic national connections to the territories). The Partition plan was merely a non-binding recommendation.
The resolution also violated Article 5 of the Mandate for Palestine and therefore it also violated Article 80 of the UN Charter. It was therefore an illegal non-binding resolution with no legal standing.
What we call the State of Israel, along with her "legal" borders, was established in April 1920 with the San Remo Resolution of 1920 and the 1919 Faisal Weizmann Agreement. Palestine was created for the first time in history as a country. It was created as the reconstitution of the Jewish National Home. The Partition Plan in 1947 was the result of a 1/4 century of illegal British policy (The English were a trustee for the Jewish people, but they violated that trust. the British wanted to control the Oil in the Middle East, for that they betrayed the Jewish people) that ripped internationally protected Jewish rights from the Jewish People, as the British allowed hundreds of thousands of Arabs to pour across the border from Syria and Egypt into Palestine. When the British illegally restricted Jewish immigration into Palestine aka The Land of Israel from the 1930’s through the late 1940 they caused the deaths of million of Jewish people trying to escape German extermination camps.
The Jewish State's reconstitution was a fact 25 years before the UN existed. The Mandate was there to protect its survival, and it was terminated, not because the terms were completed, but because the British fled with their tails between their legs, and there was no one there to administer the Mandate.
Does anyone think that after the Ottoman Empire surrendered and relinquished its rights title and ownership to Palestine and other territories to the Allied powers after WWI and the Allied powers set up and established 21 Arab States on over 12 million sq. km. with a wealth of oil reserves and one Jewish State in all of Palestine, which is about 120,000 sq. km., but today Israel has about 21,000 sq. km.. The 21 Arab States doesn’t want to relinquish or redraw its boundaries and Israel does not want to concede any of its original boundaries set up in 1920 which included the whole Palestine Mandate. None of the Palestinian Mandate was allocated to the Arabs in the 1920 San Remo Treaty or by the 1919 Faisal Weizmann Agreement.
The U.N. and the other countries must take into account and address the expulsion of over a million Jewish families from the Arab countries and the confiscation of all their assets, personal valuables. businesses, homes and land owned by Jewish people in the Arab countries, totaling over 120,000 sq. km. for over 2,600 years (6 times the size of Israel) valued in the trillions dollars and other personal assets confiscated by the Arabs countries.
The Jewish people resettled the million Jewish refugees from the Arab countries. It is about time the Arab countries that terrorized and expelled the million Jewish families and confiscated their land and assets, must settle the Arab-Palestinian refugees once and for all without compromising Israel and bring about peace and tranquility to the region.
ReplyDeleteNeither the U.N. which resolutions are non-binding with no legal standing, nor any Country in the world has the authority to create a state or dissolve a state, (check the U.N. charter and international law.)
The International Agreements of post WWI
ReplyDeleteConsider the affects of those Agreements on the Arabs and Jews. However article 16 of the Treaty of Lausanne provided:
"Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognized by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned."
The Principal Allied Powers had already proceeded to implement their intentions regarding creation of the Mandates for Syria and Lebanon, Mesopotamia and Palestine as laid out in the Treaty of Sevres and their actions were unaffected by the subsequent execution of the Treaty of Lausanne - as Article 16 made very explicit.
Their actions which had the affect of International Law and in doing so were unanimously endorsed by all 51 member states of the League of Nations.
The Arabs received over 13 million sq. km. of territory with a wealth of oil reserves while the Jewish people were allocated all of Palestine which is about 118,000 sq. km. but received only about 21,000 sq. km.
The Arabs have never accepted this binding body of international law which puts into question the validity of the 13 million sq. km. allocated to the Arabs. It has caused both Jews and Arabs lots of death and suffering over the last 97 years.
Until the Arabs acknowledge that they are legally bound by these decisions of the international community the conflict is set to continue.
YJ Draiman
We shall consider: ”Anyone in Israel considering the surrender of Jewish territory is treason and must be prosecuted”
ReplyDeleteClipping from Saint Petersburg Times (approximately 1946)
Washington – (UP) – Britain’s treaty grafting independence to Trans-Jordan violates agreements with the United States, the United Nations and the Old League, as well as the rights of the people of Palestine, Senator Francis J. Myers, Pennsylvania democrat, charged yesterday.
Echoing the words of Senator Claude Pepper, Democrat, Florida, who flayed U.S. foreign policy, Thursday, Myers asserted that Trans-Jordan is not ready for the statehood and “illegally granted”. And in offering that goal of all dependencies, he added Britain has acted “in contempt of the senate of the United States.”
* * *
“WHY THIS HASTE and Stealth?” he asked in a floor speech. “The British government which has fought all attempts at freedom, all movements for independence in the Middle East, is now discovered in the gracious role of liberator.
“Are there perhaps some hidden resources, mineral wealth or oil which are involved?”
He demanded that the state department explain its failure to protest the treaty violation, and urged that the senate demand all the facts.
Pepper charged that the United States had become a guarantor of British Imperialism, and that the British-Trans-Jordan agreement was but a “subterfuge” so long as his majesty’s troops are allowed to remain in that country. He also asserted that the United States and Britain were ganging up on Russia, and added:
“WHAT I DECRY is the international hypocrisy, sham and pretense. If the British people want the Russians to get their troops out of Iraq, let them get their troops out of Trans-Jordan. Let them get their troops out of Lebanon and Syria, and let them get their troops out of Palestine aka The Land of Israel.”
Myers picked up that tune, changing only the words. In angry mood, the dark-haired Pennsylvanian told his colleagues that:
1. The territory of Trans-Jordan is contained in the original mandate for Palestine, and under its terms, the mandate could not be unilaterally altered.
2. Under the Anglo-American Convention of 1924, Britain could not change the mandate’s terms without the consent of the United States.
3. This violation of the treaty with the United States also “strikes at the charter of the United Nations adopted at San Francisco” which “specifically states that no change can be made in the status of mandated territories without the approval of the Jewish people in Palestine and UNO’s general assembly.”
Myers asserted that there was no more justification for separating Trans-Jordan from Palestine then there was for “the separation of the United States into two nations: Trans-Mississippi and Cis-Mississippi.” The U.S. lost over 600,000 people during the civil war in order to prevent the breaking up the country
“Aaron Burr tried to do that to our nation” he said. “He was tried for treason”.
We shall consider: ”Anyone in Israel considering the surrender of Jewish territory is treason and must be prosecuted”
Posted by YJ Draiman
For former UN Ambassador, Professor Yehuda Zvi Blum, the rights vested in the Arab people of Palestine with respect to the principle of self-determination were fulfilled by violating the rights of the Jews and as a result of this initial partition of Palestine aka The Land of Israel illegally approved by the Council of the League of Nations in 1922 contrary to international agreement. According to Professor Blum: “The Arab Palestinians have long enjoyed self-determination in their own state – the Arab Palestinian State of Jordan”. (Worth mentioning here, in a letter apparently written on 17 January 1921 to Churchill’s Private Secretary, Col. T.E. Lawrence (“of Arabia”) had reported that, in return for Arab sovereignty in Iraq, Trans-Jordan and Syria, King Hussein’s eldest son, Emir Feisal—a man said by Lawrence to be known for keeping his word—had “agreed to abandon all claims of his father to Palestine”.) In favor of the Jewish people.
ReplyDeleteYJ Draiman